This is historical material, "frozen in time." The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.

THE WHITE HOUSE

OFFICE OF THE PRESS SECRETARY

For Immediate Release November 20, 1998

                       REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
                             TO THE POOL

                           Haneda Airport
                                Japan

6:05 P.M. (L)

Q Mr. President, we were told that you were briefed today on the Judiciary Committee hearings back in Washington. Can you tell us what was your impression about the hearings? What kind of guidance did you give your attorney David Kendall about his accusation that Kenneth Starr was guilty of prosecutorial misconduct? And what do you think about the subpoenas for Bruce Lindsey and Bennett?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, I got only a cursory briefing. I didn't see any of the hearings, and I really can't comment on how they went. I only became aware recently, I think after I left, that Mr. Kendall was going to be able to ask some questions. So I don't know. My understanding is that he essentially asked questions consistent with the letter he had written both to Mr. Starr and the Attorney General several weeks ago. But beyond that, I don't know. I really haven't talked to anybody back in Washington. I just got a general, cursory review of that.

Q You didn't say anything to him about prosecutorial misconduct?

THE PRESIDENT: I believe that -- I don't know this because I haven't seen it and I haven't talked to anybody -- my understanding generally was that the issues he raised were issues he had raised months ago -- at least several weeks ago. He wrote a letter to Mr. Starr and wrote a letter to the Attorney General. But I don't know very much about it. I've been here working on these economic and security issues, so I really can't say.

Q And the subpoenas of Bennett and Lindsey?

THE PRESIDENT: I'm not concerned about it, but I think Mr. Lindsey's subpoena was covered by previous decisions, but my understanding is that a subpoena for Mr. Bennett is without any precedent. That is, as far as I know, there has never been a case where a person's lawyer was asked to come and testify, but you will have to talk to them, because I really -- I haven't been there, I haven't been involved in it, I don't know what they're saying, and we'll just have to see what happens.

I've got work to do here on the American economy and on these security issues, so that's all being handled by people back in Washington.

END 6:07 P.M. (L)