View Header


                      Office of the Press Secretary 
                       (San Francisco, California) 
For Immediate Release                               September 20, 1997 
                  San Carlos Charter Learning Center 
                        San Carlos, California

11:19 A.M. PDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. First, thank all of you for coming here today and sharing your Saturday morning. I thank the Superintendent for his really marvelous remarks. He talked about all the things that we have in common -- I saw a living symbol of his dedication to education above all else, and one thing that we have in common that he didn't mention -- if you look closely at his tie you will see it is a pattern of golf balls and tees. (Laughter.) And on this beautiful Saturday morning he's here with us. (Laughter.)

Let me thank your instructional coordinator, too, for being here, leaving her 11-day-old baby. I would like to see the 11-day-old baby, but I think it's -- where's the baby? A wise mother leaves the baby outside. (Laughter.)

Hillary and I are delighted to be here. And I want to spend most of my time just at this panel today. But I thank all of you for coming because I believe in charter schools and I believe they are an important part of helping us to lift our standards and renew our schools and achieve the kind of educational excellence that all of our children need as we move into the 21st century.

I congratulate the San Carlos Learning Center for being the first of its kind in California, which obviously makes it among the very first in the United States.

Let me just give you a little, brief personal history here. When I was governor of my state for 12 years, I spent a great deal of time working on school reform -- and so did Hillary -- spent lots of time in the schools, talking to teachers, talking to parents, talking to students, dealing with issues of curriculum development and teacher training and all those things. And when we were active in the 1980s, the state of Minnesota became the first state in the country to pass a public school choice law, to give parents and their children more choice among the public schools their children attended. I think we were the second state to pass that law. And we used it quite a lot.

Then when I began to run for President in 1991, Minnesota became the first state in the country again to pass a charter school law, recognizing that sometimes it wasn't enough just to give the parents and the students choices, but that we needed to give the educators and the parents and the students with whom they worked options to create schools that fit the mission needed by the children in the area; and that if you gave them options and held them accountable, we might be able to do something really spectacular. Then five years ago today, I think, California became the second state in the country to adopt a charter school law, and then you became the first of those schools.

In 1994, I passed legislation in Congress to help us support more charter schools. By the end of 1995 there were about 300 charter schools in the country. Today there are 700 charter schools in the country. Many of them have been helped by the program we passed in Washington in 1994.

The historic balanced budget agreement that we just passed into law includes the largest commitment to new investment in education since 1965 -- among other things, expansion of Head Start programs, more funds to support computers in the schools -- I'll say more about that in a moment -- our America Reads initiative to help make sure every 8-year-old can read independently, and the biggest increased investment in helping people go to college since the G.I. Bill passed 50 years ago, tax credits for the first two years of college, credits for the remainder of college, IRAs, Pell Grants, work-study positions. All these together mean that for the first time ever we can really say, if you're responsible enough to work for it, no matter what your income or your difficulties, college is now a real option for you in America -- for every single American. And I'm very proud of all of that.

But one of the things that was in this balanced budget that didn't get a lot of notice is enough money for us to help to set up literally thousands more charter schools in America. Because excellence in education is more than money. And from my point of view, having spent years and years and years working on this, we need two things -- we need a set of national standards of academic excellence that will be internationally competitive in basic subjects. And then we need grass-roots, school-based reform, because education is the magic that takes place in every classroom, and indeed in every student's mind, involving every teacher, every student, and also, hopefully, support from home.

So that's why these charter schools are so important to me. And that's why we've tried to help a lot more schools like San Carlos get started on the path that you've been on now for some years.

For people who don't know exactly what they are, let me say that charter schools are public schools that make a simple agreement: in exchange for public funding, they get fewer regulations and less red tape, but they have to meet high expectations, and they keep their charter only so long as their customers are satisfied they're doing a good job.

As I said, we've gone from -- the day I took office, there was only one charter school in America, January of '93. Then a couple years ago we were up to 300; now there are 700. And what started as a movement in Minnesota and California now encompasses 29 states; 27 more states have passed charter school laws.

These funds in our budget, as I said, should allow us to set up several thousand more over the next four years. Today I am pleased to announce that we're going to release $40 million in grants to help charter schools open. Start-up costs are often the biggest obstacle. And in states that can't afford to help, it's a terrible problem. I see a lot of people nodding their heads out there who have had experience with this.

So we have curriculum development costs, teacher training costs, new technology costs -- all these things can help. The $40 million we're releasing today, of which about $3.4 million will come to California, will help us to establish another 500 charter schools in 21 states. So we'll go from 700 to 500 in one pop here.

And as I said, pretty soon -- and if all the states will join in, we obviously can help all of them -- we'll have well over 3,000, perhaps even over 4,000 by the year 2000, which is enough to have a seismic echo effect in all the public school systems of America. So that's what we are trying to do.

Let me say that there are a couple of problems that we're going to face. Last week, the U.S. Senate, by a very narrow margin, supported an amendment that would make these charter schools funding that I just announced the last such announcement that would ever be made, because it would lump all the education funds together and arbitrarily distribute them to the state without regard to whether these programs were continued or not. And in the process, it would abolish very specific and highly successful education reform programs like the charter schools, where we work with local communities and school districts. It would abolish our highly successful effort to put computers in the classrooms -- I'll tell you how much movement has happened on there in just two years -- and to create safe and drug-free schools. I think that \ would be a mistake.

The House of Representatives recently passed, although the Senate opposed them, an amendment that would prohibit us to pay for -- not to develop, but to pay for -- a non-political, private organization to develop voluntary national tests of excellence in mathematics and reading. I think that would be a mistake. This is the first time, last year, in history that our students in elementary schools scored above the international average in math and science. We're doing much better in America, but we don't test all of our kids, we just test a representative sample. I think we need to know how we're doing based on a common standard.

So we have these problems in the Congress, and if either one of these provisions makes it into the final bill I will have to veto it. So I hope that we can continue to work on moving forward in the right direction. And in that connection, I'd like to say a special word of appreciation to Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, who I think is one of the -- absolutely -- even I would say this if I were in Washington -- she really is one of the finest, most forward-looking members of the United States Congress, and she's made a big difference in our country today. (Applause.)

Now, running these charter schools, as we are about to hear, is not easy. It's not self-evident how to do all this. It sounds great to say we'll cut you free of red tape and bureaucracy; you have to perform at a higher level, you've got to get the parents involved. There are all kinds of practical problems, and we'll hear about some of them.

The Secretary of Education, Dick Riley, is going to convene a national conference on charter schools in Washington this November to bring together teachers, administrators, parents, others who are interested in this to share best practices and look to the road ahead. But just think about where we can go with this. If we go -- we've gone from one to 700, to 500 more, with a budget that calls for funds for 3,000 more -- just this year's budget alone that will be funded starting October 1st, if we get the funds for it, will give us enough funds for another 700 -- or 900 to 1,000 schools.

So this movement can sweep the country and can literally revolutionize both community control and standards of excellence in education if we do it right. That's what the panel is about.

And before we start, let me just thank some of the business leaders who are here today for their commitment to educational excellence -- Regis McKenna, David Ellington, Brook Byers, Terry Yang, Paul Lippe. And I'd like to say a special word of thanks to Larry Ellison who is up here on the platform. He's the chairman and CEO of Oracle Corporation.

Two years ago this week, I met with Larry and a number of other high-tech executives to talk about another one of my passions, which is to connect every classroom and library in every school in America to the Internet by the year 2000. And that, like everything else, it turned out to be more complicated. It sounded great, but we not only had to connect them, we had to make sure we had the hardware, the software, and the trained teachers to do the job.

So we got this group of business people who knew about all this, who are working very hard to try to make sure that we can do that, give all the support services to every school. We got the Federal Communications Commission to give what amounts to a $2.25 billion a year subsidy to schools, to lower the rates they have to pay to hook on to the Internet. But to give you an example of what we can do when we work together, since we made that announcement two years ago, California has 65 percent of the schools connected, which is twice the percentage you had two years ago, and four times as many classrooms connected as just two years ago. That shows you how quickly we can move.

And Larry has not only sponsored the San Carlos Learning Center, but yesterday he announced Oracle's promise to spend $100 million in a foundation to help schools across America who need support to get the kind of connection to the future through telecommunications technology that we all want. So thank you, Larry, for doing that. (Applause.)

So this is a good news day. but what I want to do now is to turn it over to the panel and let's get into the facts of the charter school movement and see -- hopefully, by being here today, this will encourage the 21 states who do not have charter school legislation to adopt it. It will encourage the Congress to fully fund the charter schools program for the next four years. And it will help us to take what you have done here and spread it all across America in a way that will guarantee international standards of excellence in the education of all of our children.

Thank you very much.

MRS. CLINTON: Well, I want to thank all of you for sharing your experiences and success stories about charter schools. And I think that there are just a couple of general points that I would make. First, what the Congresswoman just said is critical, when she talked about test kitchens, because my husband I have said together and often that there is a good public school in every community in America, but the problem is they don't learn from each other and they don't get to scale in the sense that we know what works, but for too many years we have not been motivated sufficiently to do what worked in every school.

And so we are now seeing, with the charter school movement, an effort to do just that -- to take these, in some ways, old-fashioned ideas that are now married to technology and very much motivated to be successful by the demands of the new economy, and put them into action in schools across the country.

When we talk about parental involvement, that is a very old-fashioned idea that we have had to relearn. When we talk about empowering teachers to design curriculum, that, too, is something we know will work if we unleash the creative energies of teachers. When we talk about giving students a chance to explore and learn and develop their own capacities, that's what many of us try to do with our own children, but which we deny to other children because of the bureaucratic structures and expectations of the old system.

So there are many aspects of what we heard today which would be very familiar in any setting 30 or 40 or 50 years ago in many parts of America, but which we somehow lost track of as we got bigger and bigger and schools became impersonal and anonymous, and really we lost our way in the very important connections that have to be made between homes and schools, students and teachers, and the understanding of how community has to support that magic.

Secondly, I think that the charter school movement should not be seen as a threat to public schools. It should be seen as a liberation of public schools, and particularly teachers and administrators who for many years have known what should be done, but have felt unable to do so. (Applause.) And there is certainly nothing hidden about the President's agenda on this. He wants every school, whether it is formally called a charter school, or not, to act like a charter school.

And that is our real objective in the charter school movement -- not only to create thousands more charter schools, but to take the lessons from the charter school movement and literally infect every public school in America, so that parents are standing at the door of principals' offices, so that teachers will not feel so oppressed in their classrooms, but will join together to demand from administrators and school boards what they know their children need, and for businesses, which have in many ways the greatest stake in the future of our public school system, to be constantly be prodding for academic excellence as in may communities they now prod for athletic excellence.

So the charter school movement is really a rallying cry that we hope will not only create more charter schools like the ones we have heard about today, but encourage and give courage to public school patrons, teachers, and students around the country to say, well, you know, if Jose could find a home in a new charter school in San Francisco, why can't all the Joses in our public schools feel similarly welcomed and supported? And if Gregg can go into competition with Oracle in the 6th grade, why can't all the Greggs in America feel similarly encouraged to pursue their own intellectual excitement?

So we're very much appreciative of what all of you on the front lines are doing from San Francisco to South Central, LA, to San Diego, to right here in this community. And we really do appreciate the zeal with which you have expressed your excitement about this, because we do want it to infect and to be contagious so that, as Yvonne said when I saw firsthand visiting her school, every child will feel that that child is special and valued and appreciated. And that's really what we're hoping to achieve with this kind of effort.

So thank you for doing what needs to be done in American public education. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: First of all, let me say I agree with everything she said. (Laughter.) I'd just like to make a couple of brief point to build on what Hillary said. I want to say, first of all, I have no hidden agenda here; I believe the only way public schools can survive as the instrument by which we educate our children and socialize them and bring them together across all the lines that divide us is if all of our schools eventually -- and, hopefully, sooner rather than later -- are run like these charter schools. That's what I believe. I am not running for office anymore. I have no political interest in this. I am think about what our country is going to be like 20, 30, 40, 50 years from now.

And you know what Tom said about the industrial model -- that's part of the problem. A lot of our schools are organized on an industrial model -- a lot of our middle schools are almost -- are organized for when families were like Ozzie and Harriet, instead of like they are today. There are a lot of organizational problems. It's also true that our schools get money from a lot of different places and have to suffer rules from a lot of different places, and a lot of people think if they give up their rule-making, they won't matter anymore. And in some way, the most important person here is the Superintendent because he's here supporting this instead of figuring out how he can control it. And I think that's important. (Applause.)

And so Hillary and I have been working at this business for a long time now -- seriously since 1983 -- really seriously. There has been a dramatic change in the attitudes of the teacher unions, which is positive. There have been dramatic advances in the attitude of administrators, which is positive.

But I just want to say, we cannot -- there are a lot of people who believe in the information age, with things changing as fast as they are and with standards needing to be as high as they are, that we ought to just basically send everybody money and let them do whatever they want to about education, and forget about the public education network -- let it sink or swim. The problem with that theory is that the short-term costs to people who got left behind would be staggering.

But if we want to preserve excellence and the socially unifying impact of public schools over the next generation, I am telling you, every school in the country has got to become like this one. The power needs to be with the parents, with the children, with the teachers, with the principals. And those of us who are up the lines somewhere, up the food chain, what are we interested in? We're interested in what Kim said -- we're interested in results. We don't need to make rules. We're interested in results and we want to be able to measure them. We want to know our kids are going to be all right and our country is going to be all right.

Let them make the rules in the schools. Let them figure it out. And then education will be something that will get bright young lawyers to leave their more lucrative law practices to do something that doesn't pay as much, but makes them feel good when they go to bed every night and get up in the morning. That's what we want. And until every school is run like that, you and I should not rest.

Thank you. God bless you. (Applause.)

END 12:35 P.M. PDT