THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary (St. Louis, Missouri) ________________________________________________________________________ For Immediate Release August 12, 1997
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO THE DEMOCRATIC BUSINESS COUNCIL
Windows on Washington St. Louis, Missouri
1:45 P.M. CDT
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much. First let me say a thank you to all of our Missouri hosts -- Governor Carnahan and Congressman Gephardt. Mayor Harman, thank you for making me feel so welcome to be back in St. Louis. Treasurer Holden; your State Chair Joe Carmichael. I saw Attorney General -- I mean, Senator Jay Nixon here a minute ago -- (laughter and applause) -- wherever he is.
I'd also like to acknowledge the presence here of the distinguished Democratic Senator from Illinois, Dick Durbin, who is here somewhere, I think. (Applause.) He was here earlier. I don't know if he's still here. He may have left. He's heard me give this speech before. (Laughter.)
This is, I think, my first opportunity to say a profound thank you to the people of Missouri for voting for Bill Clinton and Al Gore both in 1992 and in 1996, and I thank you for that and for giving us a chance to serve. (Applause.)
Dick Gephardt already told you some of the good results that are happening in our country. You know these things, of course. I think what I'd like to talk to you about today is why I think your contributions are important, why I'm glad you're helping our congressional campaign committee, what we hope to achieve in the coming months and, more importantly, what we hope to achieve in the years ahead.
When I ran for President in 1992, as merely -- to put it in my distinguished predecessor's phrase, merely the governor of a small southern state -- one of the things that it seemed to me was that this was a country full of wonderful people, great businesses, hard-working people, people that knew what was going on in the world and people who were anxious to take advantage of the changes; and that we were actually being disabled and limited by the way our political system worked -- that we didn't have a clear driving vision about what we wanted to look like in the 21st century and we didn't have a strategy for getting there. And I had a pretty clear, if simple, idea about what I thought America should look like when my daughter is my age.
I still have that simple idea. I want this to be a country where everybody, without regard to where they start in life, has a chance to live up to the fullest of their God-given capacities if they're willing to work for it. I want this to be a country that is coming together, not being driven apart by its diversity. And I want our country to be a place that still leads the world for peace and freedom and prosperity.
And if you want that, it's pretty easy to ask what strategy should you follow. You should do those things which create opportunity, which reinforce responsibility, which bring people together in a community of one America, not divided, and which support our world leadership in productive ways. This has not been rocket science. There has been a lot of hard work, and I've been willing to work with our friends on the Republican side when they would work with us. And when they wouldn't, as in 1993, when Dick Gephardt and I and a few others were all alone and we had no help in starting the work of reducing the deficit and getting it 80 percent done before this last budget was passed, we've been willing to do that.
But I want to make this simple point: There is always first a vision and then there is a strategy. And people either spend their time working to implement the strategy and build something positive, or playing politics as usual. And I think the record of the last four and a half years shows that it is always better to build than to tear down; it is always better to unite rather than to divide; it is always better to look to the future rather than to bring people back kicking and screaming to a past that can no longer be maintained.
And that is why these meetings and others like them we'll be having around the country are so important. Believe you me, if you look at this budget we just passed -- which had the biggest increase in funds for child health care since Medicaid was passed in 1965, the biggest increase in federal support for education since 1965, the biggest increase in helping middle class families educate their children in 50 years, since the G.I. Bill was passed for college education -- none of that would have been possible if we didn't have so many members of our party in the Congress. That was our contribution to this budget.
Cleaning up 500 toxic waste dumps -- that was our contribution to this budget. Making sure that the hardest working families in this country, the first-year police officers and nurses, firefighters with two or three kids could take full advantage of the children's tax credit -- those were our contributions to this budget.
None of it would have happened if it hadn't been for the clear knowledge I had that there were people who literally viewed the world the way I do and were willing to fight for it and stand up for it and speak for it.
We are within sight of winning back our majority in the House. We know that they will have more money than we will, from all sources -- maybe a lot more. But my experience in this business has been it's okay if they have more, but you have to have enough -- you have to have enough to get your message out. You have to have enough to give people a sense of who you are. You have to have enough to be able to answer if attacked in a way you consider to be unfair or inaccurate. And if you do, and if you work hard, and if you have the right vision and the right strategy and good candidates, you can win.
And I want to say again, we are very close now to starting a new century in a new millennium. And, yes, we have made dramatic progress. I'm glad we've got the best economy we've had in a generation. I'm glad we've got the lowest unemployment we've had in 23 years and the lowest inflation in 30 years, and the highest rate of new business starts in history. I'm glad we had the biggest drop in violent crime in 35 years. I'm glad we had the biggest drop in welfare rolls in history. I'm glad now we've got the smallest percentage of people on welfare we've had since 1970. I am very proud of all of that.
Does anyone seriously believe that this country is at this moment meeting your standards of what you want it to be like when we start the new century, what you want it to be like when your children or your grandchildren are your age? The answer to that is, no. We can do better and we have to do better. We have to do better. We have to have, among other things, a country that says whether a child is a poor immigrant child in St. Louis or a farmer's child in North Dakota, or a child in a wonderful private school in New England, they all should meet the same standards of international excellence in what they learn when they're in school. And until we do that we will not be where we need to be in education.
We need to say that in the poorest neighborhoods of this country, people still have a chance to start a business, free enterprise still has a chance to take hold, people still have a chance to build a framework of community. And if we can't do that when the economy is strong, when can we do that? We have to do that.
We have to be able to prove that we can grow the economy and preserve the environment. We have to prove that we can continue to reach out to the rest of the world with economic and political and security partnerships. We are still not where we would like to be in our heart of hearts as we move into this new century.
And finally, let me say I think very few people have thought about just how rapidly we are changing. Now, you know, I come from not very far south of here, and I can tell you, I don't know many people I grew up with who wouldn't be surprised if I told them that unless something dramatic happens within 30 to 40 years, there will be no majority race in America. But that's the truth.
Today, in our country, Hawaii is the only state where there is no racial group in the majority. Americans of European descent and Americans of Japanese descent are about 30 percent of the population. Americans of Filipino descent and Native Pacific Islanders are about 16 to 18 percent. And everybody else makes up the rest. But within five years, there will be no majority race in California -- our largest state, with 13 percent of our people. Within 30 to 40 years, unless something dramatic happens, Americans of European descent will not be a majority race in the United States for the first time since its founding.
Now, we always say, you know, we're a country founded on ideas and values, not race and place. We're about to find out. We're about to find out. And we need to be thinking about that.
And I can tell you -- we just had a delegation come back from Africa -- the largest number of Africans in the world outside Africa live in the United States. And Mr. Gephardt will tell you, we have great bipartisan support now in the Congress for our Africa trade initiative. Why? Because there are almost a billion people in Sub-Sahara Africa and only seven percent of their imports come from the United States.
So this is an economic issue, but at a deeper level it is a human issue. What occupies the President's time in the world today? You pick up the paper this morning, you see us worrying about Bosnia or the Middle East or Northern Ireland. Everywhere somebody is fighting over their racial, their ethnic or their religious differences. We are the country with the largest number of people from different racial, ethnic and religious backgrounds. And if we prove we can live together and work together and succeed together, that is the single biggest asset we will carry for world leadership, for prosperity and for peace of mind into the next century.
So I ask you to think about that. Yes, if crime is not an issue, if welfare is not an issue, if the budget is going to be balanced and all you have to think about is what you want your country to look like in the future, then ask yourself which party is more likely to deal with the fact that 20 percent of our kids are still living in poverty. Which party is more likely to deal with the fact that even though crime is down, our streets are too violent and too many of our kids have nothing to say yes to. Which party is more likely to deal with the fact that we must have a national standard of excellence in education and stop making excuses for not giving that kind of opportunity to our poor children. Which party is more likely to passionately care about reconciling the economy and the environment so that we don't have to give up our children's natural heritage to make a living today. Which party is more likely to pull this country together across all the lines that threaten to divide us.
I think the answers are easy and straightforward. But keep in mind, if you believe that, there has to be an opportunity to exercise that. I could not have accomplished anything in Congress -- with Congress -- anything that required congressional action, and most of what I have done with executive action could have been undone by Congress had it not been for the support I had from the members of my party there.
Now, we have worked hard. We have a record that commends itself to the American people and we have a chance to win their confidence in the congressional elections of 1998 if you will be there for our leaders and our cause. And if you think about the big issues, what you want this country to look like when your children are your age, I think it will justify your presence here today and keep you working right through November of next year.
Thank you. God bless you. (Applause.)
END 2:58 P.M. CDT