This is historical material, "frozen in time." The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.

THE WHITE HOUSE

                     Office of the Press Secretary
                         (Copenhagen, Denmark) 
______________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                                    July 11, 1997

                EXCERPTS OF REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
                        TO AIR FORCE ONE POOL

(Excerpts selected by the pool)

THE PRESIDENT: -- but also, what if anything can be learned.

Q When you looked down on that crowd, is it the same feeling you had in Ireland? Was it the same feeling you had in Ireland? Is it different?

THE PRESIDENT: No different, but wonderful. In Ireland it was -- you know, my feeling there was about what was then a very much alive peace process, involving the people from whence I came, and all the hope of peace between two warring factions. You know, what I saw today was different, which is this was the country which, in the end of the communist era was the most depressed. I mean, they never went through anything like Stalin's purges, where he killed millions. But at the end of the communist era they were the most depressed.

And to see the passion they have for their freedom and the way they honor the people who stood up for it in that square, and the feeling they have about America, even though they know quite well that it was our judgment that they shouldn't come into the first tranche of NATO -- I mean, it was overwhelming. And, you know, these people, too -- keep in mind, it's not like Poland, where Poland was -- and I'm not denegrating -- but Poland is now the success story of the former communist countries.

And three years ago -- we didn't do a public event in Poland; I don't know how many people would have been there, I can't say -- but the point is, where Romania is now is far more like where Poland was three years ago, maybe even longer, economically. They're still getting -- what I said in my speech today -- they're still going through the painful transition, the growing pains of going through a market economy where their economy is not growing. And they still came out to say, you know -- that was an enormous expression of national conviction and self-confidence. I mean, they were confident.

You know, those people -- you don't -- 100,000 people don't show up and stand in the sun unless they believe in what they're doing, unless they believe in themselves and their future and they believe they can keep going and they can weather this storm. You know, it was an extraordinary thing to see people who are having those kinds of economic difficulties believing they can come out of them, having no doubt that they can be full partners in the Western Alliance, showing -- they're also, I think, Romania deserves a lot of credit. I mean, it is a Balkan country and they just basically made a deal with the Hungarians and put them in the government to solve their border disputes, their problems with Ukraine and Hungary, which required enormous self-restraint, you know. Because a lot of what is now in Muldova, Muldavia, and Ukraine was once a part of Romania.

This is a country that has really, in a matter of months, just blossomed and is thinking about itself in terms of the future in ways that, of course, you know, I believe everybody said -- so I'm thrilled.

Q That's policy. But on a personal level, do you ever get used to 100,000 people hearing you?

THE PRESIDENT: No. I mean, personally, what I thought there -- that this was -- the three biggest crowds I believe I've had since I've been President, I believe -- we were just talking about it -- were this one, Dublin and Berlin. There were probably 100,000 people when I was the first President to speak on the east side of the Bradenberg Gate.

Of course, in Dublin and here I'm much more involved in the events. There, I was going to ratify what others had done, in effect, what the Germans and others had done. But in each case, to me -- on a personal basis, I thought this is not me, this is the United States. This is what people think of America. And this is a tribute to what we have stood for, what we have worked for.

And the other thing I thought was, this is an enormous responsibility. No other country could draw this sort of response at this moment in time.

THE PRESIDENT: I just had to keep watching. No, right after the landing and they brought me the first pictures, color pictures of the vehicle there still in sort of its thing, it was just exhilerating. And now, you know, everywhere I am I turn on -- and last night I was dying to go to sleep and there was this Polish language -- well, I mean, the Polish was sort of dubbed over the English and all the pictures, and I couldn't hear the English, I couldn't turn it off. I could not turn it off. I just had to keep watching it.

Q It's making more headlines than the trip, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: It's just thrilling, isn't it?

Q But it did make history in press relations. It's the first time a President of the United States has been asked, what do you hear from Mars, and actually answered the question. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: I know it.

Q Well, John Glenn wants to go.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I think -- I think it would be a great thing and I do think the argument that he could be -- that he could be helpful in analyzing not only the effects of space travel on a normal person, but also what, if anything, could be learned about weightlessness and that sustained experience that might help us back home to deal with the increasing health challenges of our aging population. I think all that's really important.

Q It could be ironic because it was President Kennedy's order --

Q -- Mr. Chretien. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. You know, look, first of all, he is a superior human being. He is a very fine man. And he's a great leader and he has been a fabulous ally of ours in Bosnia, in Haiti where they're carrying most of the load now, in many different ways. And we have no more strong ally. You know, this is just not going to bother me. I'm just not going to let this be static on our radar screen. We can't afford to do it. There's too much between our two countries. That's the most important thing. And there's too much between us personally. You've got to blow something like that off.

Q Is it a basic rule of politics that you should always assume microphones are on?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. But, you know, you remember when that happened to President Reagan when he was doing the radio address?

Q We start bombing in 10 minutes?

THE PRESIDENT: It's happened to me before. It happened to me in '92, do you remember?

Q Yes -- Jesse Jackson.

THE PRESIDENT: I had a particularly embarassing incident in '92. It happened to other people in the primary in '92 were with me. If you do this business long enough and you operate under enough pressure and you have enough short nights where you don't get enough sleep, you're going to say something to somebody you wish you hadn't said that will wind up being a public statement. If you do it long enough, it's going to happen to everybody and it's just not a big deal to me. He's a terrific human being and a great leader and they're our great ally.

Q But you are going to beat him on the golf course?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I will try to get even on the golf course. The last time -- the last two times I've played with him I didn't play very well and I haven't beat him like I should. So I'm going to try to do better next time.

Q -- instruct them how we can --

THE PRESIDENT: First of all, I'm very interested in this, but I literally know nothing about it. All I know is what you said to me in your question. So I need to get back and really study it because obviously I'm very interested in it not only from a forensic point of view, but just because the assassination of Martin Luther King was one of the most traumatic events of my youth. I remember it like it was yesterday -- April 4, 1968.

Q Do you think Oswald killed Kennedy?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

Q You've read the report and you belive it?

THE PRESIDENT: I'm satisfied that they did a pretty good job on that. They did a good job. I think they --

Q Why do you think Ruby killed Oswald -- why do you think Ruby then killed Oswald? Did they want to shut him up?

THE PRESIDENT: I don't know.

Q Mr. President, can I ask --

THE PRESIDENT: No, no -- the statement we put out is the truth. There were sealed indictments. These guys were indicted. And they were within the SFOR mandate -- that is, they were in regular contact with SFOR soldiers.

And so they almost -- in the British sector they felt they had an obligation to try to apprehend them because they were in regular contact with them. And we agreed to help because of the need, because there were -- you know, because there could be problems and we had to get them out and get them to The Hague as soon as possible.

Q Mr. President, I think we're trying to figure out is whether it's that circumstance or a conscious decision to change --

THE PRESIDENT: Well, if you look at the statement, I don't think that's so much -- let me say if you look at the statement made by the foreign ministers at Sentra and if you look at the statement that came out of the Group of 8 and the NATO meeting itself, the statement we issued, we basically believe that we have to make an effort to save the Dayton process. And there are lots of elements in the Dayton process. This one, obviously, is, at the moment, the most compelling -- especially since unfortunately the man fired on the troops and therefore was killed.

But if go back over this, there are several elements to Dayton. There's what we now call SFOR and its predecessor. There's local police -- train local police. There's municipal elections. There's setting up the shared institutions. There's the arms controls provisions. There's the infrastructure. And then there's the economic development. I think that's all -- there are basically eight separate elements.

And what we admitted to ourselves, and one of the most interesting things at the Group of 8 was that because SFOR was keeping anything bad from happening, if you will, there was too much focus being given to what happens in June of '88 (sic) and too little focus being given to each of these other elements.

So I think it would be a fair conclusion for you to draw that we made a commitment in each of these places -- the Sintra meeting, the NATO meeting, the G-8 -- that every element should be given greater attention. We also got a new guy in there on the civilian side, Westendorp, and with a very aggressive American aide named Klein we think a lot of, he did a good job in eastern Slavonia. And we have a very competent NATO Secretary General in Solana and we're about -- and a commander, George Joulwan who's been great -- is about to leave and be replaced by Wes Clark, who was our military man when Dayton was negotiated.

Q Are you going to talk --

THE PRESIDENT: He's doing what he should be doing. He is --

Q -- General Joulwan?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I know. He wants to retire.

Q You can't talk him -- did you try?

THE PRESIDENT: No, I don't discuss that.

Q I'm sorry. All right.

THE PRESIDENT: But he is fabulous.

MR. MCCURRY: We've got to go.

Q But, wait, he didn't tell us what he thinks of the Berger --

Q It is not a change in the mission. It is a determination to execute it more forcefully and more --

THE PRESIDENT: It would be fair for you to conclude that we have decided we should try to save Dayton. And to save Dayton, all the elements had to be implemented. And that it's too easy for everybody involved to lean on SFOR as a crutch. But it also would be wrong to conclude that there was a decision to basically totally reform the mission. This was clearly within the mission.

Q -- (inaudible) --

THE PRESIDENT: That's right. Properly read, this was plainly within our mission.

Q Right.

Q Are they under indictments?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Yes, they are.