View Header


Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release June 20, 1994
                    INTERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT
                         THE "TODAY SHOW"
                         The Oval Office

7:09 A.M. EDT

Q Forty years ago, Harry Truman, who was staying at the Waldorf Astoria hotel here in New York City, decided to take a morning stroll down West 49th Street. There, the story goes, he noticed a group of onlookers watching the Today Show through its street-level glass window. He decided to join the crowd, and thus this unusual picture.

Today, minus the stroll, we are pleased to welcome another President to our street-level digs. Mr. President, good morning. Welcome to Studio 1A.

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning, Bryant. I wish I were with Harry Truman today, out there on the street, looking in.

Q Well, Katie and I are very grateful that you're allowing us the opportunity to interview you this morning. Thank you for taking the time.

Let's start with North Korea, if we might. Former President Jimmy Carter, just back from the Korean Peninsula in meetings with Kim Il Sung, has said that he believes the crisis has been defused, and at this point any sanctions would be counterproductive.

Do his opinions reflect the views of your administration in any way? And if not, could you detail the extent to which his views and his trip may have changed your approach?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the North Koreans asked President Carter to come as a private citizen. He called me, and we agreed that the trip might be productive -- that he would go; he would listen; he would faithfully state the views of our administration; and reaffirm that our interest is in seeing that North Korea honor it's commitments under the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and its commitment to a nonnuclear Korean Peninsula.

While there, when he notified us about what they were saying, we put out a statement, which he reaffirmed, which simply said that if North Korea wishes to talk and is willing to freeze their nuclear program -- that is, not continue reprocessing or refueling while they talk, then that would be a step forward. He says that Kim Il Sung made that commitment to him. Now we have to verify that. So that's the question.

We have, surely, something to gain by talking with the North Koreans, by avoiding further steps toward a crisis. But we have to know there's been a change. So we'll be looking to verify that. And that's really the question. This is a question of fact now.

There are some hopeful signs -- the willingness to meet between North and South. But the critical question is, are they willing to freeze this nuclear program while we try to work these differences out?

Q You say there are hopeful signs. Are you prepared to respond with positive sings of your own, or have you reason to believe that Kim Il Sung's history suggests there's a wide divergence between what he says and what he does?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think what we have to do is to look to the present and the future and say we will evaluate words in terms of actions. We have the capacity if the international inspectors and the equipment going to be left there to evaluate whether, in fact, the nuclear program has been frozen. If it's going to be frozen, then clearly that is a grounds for talking. But we have to know what the facts are, and we'll be attempting to determine that.

Q Mr. President, moving to matters closer at home now, yesterday on Meet the Press, Senator Moynihan, Chairman of the Finance Committee, said that there was no chance that Congress will pass a health care plan that will give all Americans immediate insurance coverage. If that, in fact, is the case, will you accept a plan that will give -- provide universal coverage somewhere down the road?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, Katie, our plan required a phase-in. It's going to take some time for the states and for others who would have to provide the insurance who don't now to phase it in. But I think the important thing is that we should not walk away from this Congress without a commitment to cover everyone. The so-called 91 percent solution, if it's a permanent solution, essentially would guarantee what we have now. The poor would get health care, the wealthy would get health care, the middle class would be at risk of losing it. One in 10 Americans would not have any health care all the time, and others would be losing it.

Keep in mind, we now have 3 million more Americans without health insurance than we had three years ago. The situation in terms of coverage is getting worse -- more and more middle class Americans at risk.

All I want to do is to give the American people what the President and the Congress and the federal government employees have. And my proposal would cost small businesses much, much less than the last minimum wage increase that President Bush signed.

Now, I admit that we needed to make some changes in our original proposal. I always said we would. We want it now to be less bureaucratic and less regulatory. And the proposals are. They reflect some changes that we have agreed to. But we have to cover all Americans. And that's the real issue.

Q So you're saying some of the bills that are being discussed in Senate Finance, which will provide insurance coverage for 91 percent, that if those bills, or a bill like that comes to your desk, you'll veto it?

THE PRESIDENT: What I'm saying is I don't think it will come to my desk for the simple reason that if you look at what the bill does, the bill that covers 91 percent of Americans, the proposal would cost middle class taxpayers more tax money, essentially subsidize low-income people, and leave middle class workers either without health insurance or at risk of losing it because of all the problems we have in the system today. So I really don't believe it is a solution.

I know that there had tens of millions of dollars in special interest money spent to convince the American people that our plan is wrong. I know that we needed to make some changes in our plan. But I also know that the right thing for America is to do what every other advanced country has done in guaranteeing middle class working people health care that can't be taken away.

When Harry Truman stopped by the Today Show 40 years ago and looked in at Dave Garroway -- who, by the way, was the first fellow I ever saw that wore a bow tie, so I remember this very well -- he knew that. And they beat him to pieces over health care. And they drove the popularity of his proposal down. And he was never able to pass it. But Harry Truman was right then, and we're right now.

The right thing for America's values, for work, for family, is to provide health care for all Americans. It doesn't have to be done tomorrow. It ought to be phased in over a period of just a few years. But we ought not to walk away without a bill that provides health care to all Americans.

Q Mr. President, lets turn to Haiti, if we could for a moment. It's being reported in this morning's paper that your administration is trying to induce Haiti's three top military leaders to leave Haiti for a comfortable life in exile, perhaps by managing somehow to pay them off.

Is that something that's being pursued? And if you can get them to leave Haiti, are you at all interested in bringing them to justice after that?

THE PRESIDENT: We have always said, if you go back to the beginning of this administration, that we had no interest in trying to persecute anybody. President Aristide himself agreed on an amnesty proclamation as part of the agreement we had last year.

The military leaders broke that agreement. We are still looking at any number of options to try to restore democracy to Haiti so that that troubled country can begin to have some economic growth, and the people who have been so oppressed by the military dictators can escape their oppression. So we have a number of options under consideration.

What happens to those who violate the law, I think, depends in part on what the democratic government decides to do. But President Aristide all along has said that he was interested in honoring the original conditions of the Governors Island agreement. It was the other side which broke them.

Q All right. Mr. President, I'm going to ask you to hold on for just a little bit. We're going to take a commercial break, then we'll come back and get to talk a little more, maybe even take some questions from the street.

Q As we come back at 7:18 a.m., we're continuing with President Bill Clinton from the Oval Office. The President has graciously agreed to take some questions from our viewers outside. He's a fan of town meetings -- why not?

Q Absolutely. And our first man on the street is actually a woman on the street. She is Donna from Boston. Donna, good morning, what's your question for the President?

Q Good morning. Good morning, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning, Donna.

Q The question I have for you is, I've been reading a lot in the paper about the cost of universal health care. And as you know, small businesses are very concerned with the amount that they're going to have to pay. If, in fact, small businesses are going to pay less than big business, how will you make up that difference? Will there have to be an additional tax imposed on the people?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we propose to make up that difference in two ways. First of all, by raising the cigarette tax; and secondly by achieving other savings in government programs. Then we ask the very biggest businesses in the country, who are going to get a big reduction, many -- most of them -- from our health care plan, because we're going to spread the cost more evenly throughout the country to pay a small amount of money into a program that will support the subsidies for small business and continuing medical research.

This will work because of the competitive pressures to hold health care costs down if we get everybody in the system. That is, I think that it's hard for most Americans to realize this, but we're already spending about 40 percent more of our income, as a percentage of our income, than any other country on Earth. And yet we're the only country that doesn't require everybody to have some health coverage.

So it seems to me that the simplest way to do it is to just take the system we have, which is an employer-based system that over 80 percent of the Americans are covered by and just extend it to everybody. But in order to do it, because we have so many small employers, you've got to give them a discount. And I wouldn't do this in this way if I weren't convinced that it would help the economy in the medium term and over the long term. We can't do anything that will run unemployment up. This will balance out the scales, in my judgment, and help more small businesses create jobs.

Keep in mind, most small businesses are giving health insurance now and paying 35 percent or 40 percent more than bigger business and government. And as a consequence, that undermines their ability to compete. They can't get fair rates. And the proposal we have, I will say again, will cost small business considerably less than the minimum wage increase that President Bush signed into office a couple of years before I became President.

Q Mr. President, next up is Betty from Park Ridge, Illinois.

Q Betty, good morning.

THE PRESIDENT: That's a great town.

Q Yes, it certainly is. And I have one of your more difficult questions. I graduated with Hillary from Main South High School in 1965, and since I'm on the reunion committee, my question is this -- putting you on the spot -- will we be able to have our 30th high school reunion being held at the White House?

THE PRESIDENT: (Laughter.) That's a decision for her to make. But I'll bet you she would like to welcome you here at the White House. I'm trying to work out an opportunity to welcome my 30th high school reunion class to the White House as well. I think both of us would like that very much. And I will tell her that you asked. I'm sure -- I hope she's watching this morning, but I'll tell her. And I'll be she would love that.

Q Mr. President, let me close, if I could, with one that isn't a national issue, but one I'm sure you have some feelings on. The entire country, as you know, watched the O.J. Simpson drama unfold last week. What are your own personal thought about the fall from such a -- from grace of such an American hero?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, it's a genuine tragedy. In some ways it's a story as old as time, in some ways it's a modern story. It's, of course, the biggest tragedy because two people were killed, children were robbed of a mother, a family's lost loved ones, and a man widely admired in this country is now caught in the web of a terrible tragedy. But I have to say that after we all watched it in excruciating detail last weekend, the time has now come for the legal process to take it's course. I think the less the rest of us say from now on in until the legal process takes its course, the better.

Q Mr. President, we thank you very much for taking the time to be with us --


Q helping to christen our new studio. We appreciate it and hope you'll come back.

Q Next on President Clinton, come here to New York and see us.

THE PRESIDENT: Oh, I'd like that. I'd like to be looking -- I'd like to be on the outside looking in, asking you questions. (Laughter.)

Q For a change, I guess, right?

THE PRESIDENT: That's right.

END7:23 A.M. EDT